首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

刑事诉讼中私人违法取得证据之证据能力评析
引用本文:高咏.刑事诉讼中私人违法取得证据之证据能力评析[J].证据科学,2011,19(1):56-63.
作者姓名:高咏
作者单位:北京第二外国语学院法政学院
摘    要:刑事诉讼中如何处理私人非法取得的证据是一个理论和实践都不能回避的重要课题.美国的"私人放任模式"和德国的"利益权衡模式"分别是处理私人违法所得证据的证据能力的两种典型模式,这两种模式各有其不同的特征和利弊得失.私人违法取证在我国刑事诉讼司法实践中普遍存在,但立法规定和理论研究薄弱,私人违法证据的两种典型模式对我国证据立...

关 键 词:私人违法所得证据  证据能力  非法证据排除规则  证据禁止

Analysis of the Evidence Competence of Evidence Illegally Obtained by Individuals in Criminal Procedure
Gao Yong.Analysis of the Evidence Competence of Evidence Illegally Obtained by Individuals in Criminal Procedure[J].Evidence Science,2011,19(1):56-63.
Authors:Gao Yong
Institution:Gao Yong.The School of Law and Pilitcs,Beijing International Studies University,Beijing 100024.
Abstract:In terms of the criminal procedure,to deal with the evidence illegally obtained by individuals is inevitably an issue of vital importance both in theory and in practice.There are two representative modes of evidence competence dealing with the illegal evidence acquired individuals.One isthe American "Individual Noninterference",and the other is the German "Interests Balancing".Both have their own characteristics as well as advantages and disadvantages.Collecting evidence illegally by individual commonly exists in the criminal procedure practice of China,while the legislative regulation and theoretical study are still relatively weak.These two typical modes are,to some extent,enlightening to develop and perfect Chinese evidence theory and legislation.
Keywords:Evidence illegally obtained by individuals  Evidence competence  Rule of excluding illegal evidence  Evidence prohibition
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号