| 论外国商事仲裁裁决司法审查的适度性 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 肖平容.论外国商事仲裁裁决司法审查的适度性[J].仲裁研究,2011(1). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 肖平容 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 内江师范学院; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 关于法院对外国裁决的司法审查,国内学者提出了程序审查论和全面审查论,但都有其局限。仅审查程序不能保证外国仲裁裁决的公正,全面审查又扩大了司法审查的范围,应建立适度性司法审查原则。法院应对外国裁决的程序和实体内容进行审查,但对实体内容的审查应限定在一定范围内,反对法院对实体内容过度干预。对裁决的实体审查仅限于两种情况:一是当事人协议约定审查裁决的实体内容;二是裁决确有明显实体错误,法院可依职权审查。
|
| 关 键 词： | 国际商事仲裁 外国裁决 适度性司法审查 |
Discussion on Moderate Judicial Review of Foreign Arbitral Awards of Commerce |
| |
| Xiao Pingrong.Discussion on Moderate Judicial Review of Foreign Arbitral Awards of Commerce[J].Arbitration Study,2011(1). |
| |
| Authors: | Xiao Pingrong |
| |
| Institution: | Xiao Pingrong |
| |
| Abstract: | The domestic scholars presented theory of procedural review and theory of comprehensive review on principle of judicial review which courts should adhere to when they review foreign arbitral awards of commerce,but both have their limitations.The review only on judicial process can not guarantee the impartiality of the arbitration,and the comprehensive review will magnify the scope of the judicial review,and therefore we should insist on the theory of moderation of judicial review.Courts should review the pr... |
| |
| Keywords: | international arbitration of commerce foreign awards moderation of judicial review |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
