盗窃罪保护法益的理论嬗变与司法抉择——新修正的所有权说之提倡

关于财产罪保护法益究竟采取所有权说还是占有说,在德日刑法以及我国刑法理论之中均存在较大争议。就一般情形而言,无论采取所有权说或者占有说,对案件的定性并不存在分歧,但是在特定案件中对定罪量刑具有实质性影响。立足于我国刑法的相关规定以及司法解释的立场,对盗窃罪保护法益应当提倡"新修正的所有权说"。对于司法实践中发生的所有权人擅自处置被公权力机关依法扣押、查封的财物,擅自取回处于他人合法占有之下的财物以及以非法手段侵害他人占有的违禁品、赃物的案件,在"新修正的所有权说"指导下均能得出妥当且统一的结论。

The Crime of Theft Protection Theory Evolution and Judicial Choice Law Benefit --The Advocate of Ownership Revised Theory

About the property crime the protection of law in German and Japanese criminal law and the criminal law whether take ownership or possession, exists controversy. Generally speaking, whether to take ownership or possession, the qualitative case does not exist differences, but have a substantial effect on the conviction and sentencing in specific cases. The relevant provisions of the criminal law of our country and based on the position of judicial interpretation, the theft protection law should advocate ＂modified ownership＂. For the judicial practice of unauthorized disposal were seized, the ownership of public authority with the seizure of property, to get under the lawful possession of property of others as well as others possession of contraband, stolen goods infringed by illegal means under the guidance of cases, can give the proper and uniform conclusion in ＂said＂ correction of ownership.