首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论已决事实的预决效力——以台湾地区争点效的要件为借鉴
引用本文:张自合.论已决事实的预决效力——以台湾地区争点效的要件为借鉴[J].山东警察学院学报,2011,23(5):38-43.
作者姓名:张自合
作者单位:中国人民大学法学院,北京,100872
摘    要:既判力只及于判决主文中对于诉讼标的之判断,判决理由中的判断无既判力。判决理由中的判断对后诉有一定的拘束力,即已决事实的预决效力。《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》第9条第4项规定了判决理由的预决效力,但尚待完善。我国台湾地区争点效的理论与实践有一定的借鉴意义。有预决效力的已确认事实应限于前诉的主要事实,受预决效力约束的当事人应与前案当事人一致。前诉判决的已决事实可因在后诉中当事人提出的新证据而直接导致相异认定。

关 键 词:既判力  争点效  预决效力  新证据

On the Predetermined Weight of Determined Facts
ZHANG Zi-he.On the Predetermined Weight of Determined Facts[J].Journal of Shandong Police College,2011,23(5):38-43.
Authors:ZHANG Zi-he
Institution:ZHANG Zi-he(School of Law,Renmin University of China,Beijing,100872,China)
Abstract:Res Judicata only refers to the judgment of object of litigation in the main body of a court verdict.The judgment in the grounds of decision has no res judicata but certain binding effect to later litigations which is called as the predetermined weight of determined facts.Predetermined weight of determined facts was stipulated in Some Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence in Civil Procedure.Mainland China can be enlightened from both the theory and practice of issue preclusion validity in Tai...
Keywords:res judicata  issue preclusion validity  predetermined weight  new evidence  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号