首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

司法赔偿中确认程序之检讨及前瞻
引用本文:蔡金荣,胡小双.司法赔偿中确认程序之检讨及前瞻[J].桂海论丛,2006,22(5):77-79.
作者姓名:蔡金荣  胡小双
作者单位:苏州大学,江苏,苏州,215006
摘    要:在我国《国家赔偿法》中,确认程序是赔偿请求人获得司法赔偿的必经程序,然而由于现行的司法赔偿的确认程序存在着主体中立性不足、确认期限缺省、确认标准模糊、救济途径单一等诸多不足,使得确认程序遭致广泛的批评。对待确认程序的理性态度是揭示出其生成的宪政体制因素,并以此为基础将现行司法赔偿确认程序设计成可选择的程序,并在人大中设立最终处理机关。

关 键 词:司法赔偿  确认程序  生成原因  宪政体制
文章编号:1004-1494(2006)05-0077-03
修稿时间:2006年5月24日

Criticism and Forward-Looking of The Affirmation Procedure in Judicial Compensation
CAI Jin-rong,HU Xiao-shuang.Criticism and Forward-Looking of The Affirmation Procedure in Judicial Compensation[J].Guihai Tribune,2006,22(5):77-79.
Authors:CAI Jin-rong  HU Xiao-shuang
Abstract:According to Chinese State Compensation Law,Affirmation Procedure is necessary in judging a case of compensation.However,due to its lot of defects like non-neutrality of the judging organ,lack of affirmation term,faintness of affirmation standard and shortage of compensation method,the current Affirmation Procedure is being widely criticized.What should be done is to find out its constitutional cause and to turn it into an alternative procedure,additionally,to set up terminal judging organ in the People's Congress Institution.
Keywords:Judicial Compensation  Affirmation Procedure  cause  constitutional system
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号