| 量刑事实证明初论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李玉萍.量刑事实证明初论[J].证据科学,2009,17(1):15-24. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李玉萍 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 最高人民法院中国应用法学研究所 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 量刑活动与定罪活动的相对独立性，决定了量刑事实的构成、量刑证据、量刑事实的证明要求以及量刑事实的运用等不同于定罪事实。量刑事实的证明一般奉行“谁主张，谁举证”原则，罪重事实的证明应达到排除合理怀疑标准，罪轻事实的证明达到优势证据标准即可。
|
| 关 键 词： | 量刑事实 相对独立性 证明责任 证明标准 |
An Primary Discussion of Proof of Sentencing Facts |
| |
| Li Yuping.An Primary Discussion of Proof of Sentencing Facts[J].Evidence Science,2009,17(1):15-24. |
| |
| Authors: | Li Yuping |
| |
| Institution: | Li Yuping( Chinese Law Application Institute of the Supreme People＇s Court, Beijin 100745) |
| |
| Abstract: | Due to the relative independence between sentencing and convicting, these two concepts are different in terms of facts, evidence, proof requirement and application of facts. Proof of sentencing facts is subject to the principle of ＂the accuser bears the burden of proof＂. The prosecutor must establish the existence of aggravating facts beyond a reasonable doubt, while the defendant estabhshes the existence of mitigating facts by preponderance. |
| |
| Keywords: | Sentencing facts Relative independence Burden of proof Standard of proof |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
