首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

刑事证据视野中的盘查记录
引用本文:马静华.刑事证据视野中的盘查记录[J].法律与医学杂志,2010(1).
作者姓名:马静华
作者单位:四川大学法学院;
摘    要:盘查记录有《当场盘问、检查笔录》和《挡获经过(说明)》两种形式,它们在制作主体、形成时间空间、证明内容等方面具有不同特点,之所以如此,源于不同的警务机制。盘查记录的诉讼证据资格不应有任何疑问,这是因为在违法—犯罪二元追诉机制下,刑事立案前的查缉活动由负责日常警务的警察依法进行,由此获得的证据必然具有合法性。在证明作用方面,盘查记录因其证明内容的综合性、直接性和不可替代性,从而具备了很强的诉讼推进能力。从立法完善角度,应当统一盘查记录的形式,规范其制作方式和记载内容,明确盘查记录的诉讼证据地位。

关 键 词:刑事证据  盘查记录  证据资格  证明作用  

The Role of Frisk Evidence in the Criminal Justice System
Ma Jinghua. Sichuan University,Chengdu,Sichuan ,P. R. China..The Role of Frisk Evidence in the Criminal Justice System[J].The Journal of Law & Medicine,2010(1).
Authors:Ma Jinghua Sichuan University  Chengdu  Sichuan  P R China
Institution:Ma Jinghua. Sichuan University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610064,P. R. China.
Abstract:There are generally two kinds of searches of criminal suspects: the frisk or pat-down at the scene of an investigation and the search at booking-in. .These two procedures differ in scope, time and place. Evidence produced during a frisk search is competent evidence when taken in compliance with routine proce-dure. The evidence obtained in a frisk search is often very important in a prosecution due to the immediacy of the search and the closer connection to the offense and the offender. In view of legislativ...
Keywords:Criminal Evidence  Stop and Frisk Records  Competency of Evidence  Proof Function  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号