Dangerousness of civil commitment candidates |
| |
Authors: | Virginia Aldigé Hiday |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Sociology, North Carolina State University, 27695-8107, Raleigh, North Carolima 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina Medical School, 27695-8107, Chapel Hill, North Carolima
|
| |
Abstract: | ![]() This study followed a large, statewide sample of civil commitment candidates both in and out of the hospital for 6 months following their postcourt hearings to determine their postcourt dangerousness. It objectively measures dangerousness by dividing it into five legal components of behavior: (1) type, (2) object, (3) frequency, (4) weapon/means, and (5) severity of outcome. Using data from ward charts, readmission evaluations, recommitment affidavits, and arrest and community mental health center records, it describes candidates' dangerousness in terms of those, five components and compares that dangerousness with the alleged dangerous behavior that brought them into the civil commitment process. It finds that candidates do not tend to be dangerous in the 6 months following their court hearings. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|