Counterterrorism strategies in the lab |
| |
Authors: | Daniel G. Arce Sneha Bakshi Rachel T. A. Croson Catherine C. Eckel Enrique Fatas Malcolm Kass |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Economics Program, University of Texas at Dallas, GR 31, Richardson, TX, 75080, USA 2. Department of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
|
| |
Abstract: | ![]() We conduct experiments to test the collective action dilemmas associated with defensive and proactive counterterror strategies. Defensive policies are associated with creating public ??bads' (e.g., a commons) whereas proactive policies are akin to the voluntary provision of public goods. When combined, the inefficiency of collective action is exacerbated, resulting in a situation known as a Prisoner??s Dilemma squared (PD2). Deterministic versus probabilistic equivalent versions of the associated externalities are compared within a laboratory setting. Experimental results reveal that the collective action problem associated with counterterror strategies is deepened in uncertain environments, and is indeed a robust regularity that is not easily overcome; as individuals gain more experience, they become even more self-interested. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|