首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

以刑制罪:刑法教义学与刑事政策学相互贯通的路径选择
引用本文:赵运锋.以刑制罪:刑法教义学与刑事政策学相互贯通的路径选择[J].北方法学,2014,8(5):60-69.
作者姓名:赵运锋
作者单位:上海政法学院刑事司法学院
基金项目:本文受上海市高校一流学科(法学方向)建设项目资助;也是上海政法学院央财项目“刑法解释方法实践人才基地建设”阶段性成果.
摘    要:刑法教义学与刑事政策之间不仅是宏观的关系构造,还有微观的勾连论证,尤其是后者,在风险社会背景下具有更加重要的理论价值和实践意义。刑法刑事政策化是我国刑法教义学的发展方向,为了推动刑法教义学与刑事政策从相互隔离到相互融通,就需要在刑法理论上为政策要素进入刑事教义学构建合适路径。在消弭刑法教义学与刑事政策学李斯特鸿沟的过程中,以刑制罪司法逻辑具有特殊的价值和意义。

关 键 词:刑法教义学  刑事政策  李斯特鸿沟  以刑制罪

Charges Subjecting to Penalty: A Path Selection of Interpenetration between the Criminal Law Dogmatics and Criminal Policies
ZHAO Yun-feng.Charges Subjecting to Penalty: A Path Selection of Interpenetration between the Criminal Law Dogmatics and Criminal Policies[J].Northern Legal Science,2014,8(5):60-69.
Authors:ZHAO Yun-feng
Abstract:The criminal law dogmatics and criminal policies have not only macroscopic structural relations but also micro connections, and the latter in particular has more important theoretical value and practical sig- nificance in the context of risk society. The developing direction for the criminal law dogmatics in China is from criminal law to criminal policy, and in order to promote the criminal law dogmatics and criminal policy from isolation to accommodation, it is necessary to establish a proper path to insert the policy dements into dogmatics of criminal law. In the alleviation of Liszt gap between the criminal law dogmatics and the criminal policy, the judicial logic of charges subjecting to penalty has special value and significance.
Keywords:criminal law dogmatics criminal policy Liszt gap charge subjecting to penalty
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号