| 检察官客观义务:制度本源与实践限度 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郭松.检察官客观义务:制度本源与实践限度[J].法制与社会发展,2009(3). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郭松 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 四川大学法学院; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 从现代政治权力的原理来看,检察官客观义务的意义在于按照现代性的权力逻辑与治理模式,实现了现代刑事诉讼权力结构的分化并维系着刑事司法制度的正当性。由于刑事诉讼制度本身与检察官个体都无法克服与超越刑事司法中的某些固有因素,检察官客观义务在实践中存在相当的限度。在推动刑事诉讼制度合理化建设上,我们应该在深入理解检察官客观义务的基础上,推行一些更为现实的改革方略。
|
| 关 键 词： | 客观义务 权力机制 限度 现实主义 |
Objective Obligation of Prosecutors:System Origin v.s. Practical Limitation |
| |
| GUO Song.Objective Obligation of Prosecutors:System Origin v.s. Practical Limitation[J].Law and Social Development,2009(3). |
| |
| Authors: | GUO Song |
| |
| Institution: | Law School;Sichuan University;Chengdu;Sichuan;610064 |
| |
| Abstract: | In perspective of modern politics,the objective obligation serves to the separation of power and the legality of system in light of modern political logic and administration. However,this obligation is hard to achieved in practice due to the inherent factors from criminal procedure and individual prosecutor. In the reform toward a more rational system,a deeper exploring and more practical measures shall be adopted on this issue beyond the aura of objective obligation. |
| |
| Keywords: | objective obligation mechanism of power limitation realism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
