知识产权法律中责令停止侵权罚则的探讨

以武汉晶源诉日本富士化工、华阳电业一案为例,在分析我国法律法规和国际条约相关规定的基础上,探讨法院在什么情况下可以不支持权利人关于“责令停止侵权行为”的诉求.通过比较公共利益强制许可与法官做出继续执行判决的起因、二者适用的实体法和程序法等,探讨了以公共利益为由责令不停止侵权与公共利益强制许可的区别与联系.根据对武汉晶源案的分析,提出了完善和修改专利法相关规定的几点思考.

Exploration on the Application of “Order to Stop the Infringement” in the Intellectual Property Laws

Taking the case" Wuhan Jingyuan Enviromental Project Tech, Inc.v. Japanese Fuji Chemical Industrial Co.,LTD. and. Huayang Electric Industry Ltd." as an example, through analysis of the provisions of the relevant laws and regulations of China and that of TRIPS, this article explores the question that in what circumstances the court may decline to enjoin the continuing "infringement" under the patent law and the principles of equity. By looking into the background for the decision execution or for the compulsory license based on public interest as well as the applied substantive and procedural laws, this article briefs the differences between the grant of public interest compulsory license and the decision of the court that permitting continuing to use the patented technology in face of infringement. Based on the analysis of this case, the author proposes several points for further consideration in the future revisions of the patent law for the improvement of the patent system.