| 论刑事诉讼中实体公正与程序公正之关系 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张焕霞. 论刑事诉讼中实体公正与程序公正之关系[J]. 政法学刊, 2002, 19(3): 36-37 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张焕霞 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 甘肃政法学院公安分院,甘肃兰州 730070 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 程序公正近年来在我国法学理论界引起很大争论与探讨,就刑事诉讼中实体公正与程序公正之关系,各种观点百家争鸣,而该问题不仅为诉讼理论问题,且关系到诉讼中人权保障、诉讼模式等一系列实质内容,但有些提法抛开法律文化背景与法制现状,一味强调程序优先或过分坚持实体优先,有失偏颇。
|
| 关 键 词： | 实体公正 程序公正 大陆法系 英美法系 法的价值 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-3745(2002)03-0036-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002-04-16 |
On the Relationships between Substantive Fairness and Procedural Fairness in Criminal Lawsuits |
| |
| ZHANG Huan-xia Public Security School of Gansu Institute of Political Science and Law,Lanzhou ,China. On the Relationships between Substantive Fairness and Procedural Fairness in Criminal Lawsuits[J]. Journal of Political Science and Law, 2002, 19(3): 36-37 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Huan-xia Public Security School of Gansu Institute of Political Science Law Lanzhou China |
| |
| Affiliation: | ZHANG Huan-xia Public Security School of Gansu Institute of Political Science and Law,Lanzhou 730070,China |
| |
| Abstract: | In recent years procedural fairness has given rise to heated debates in the legal circles in our country over therelationships between substantive fairness and procedural fairness in criminal lawsuits. The arguments are not only related toprocedural theories but also to such concrete contents as human rights protection and procedural modes. However, some of thearguments, like those that over-emphasize the priority for either procedures or substantives, are biased because they neglectthe legal cultural backgrounds and the current state of rule by law. |
| |
| Keywords: | substantive fairness procedural fairness the Continental law system the American and British Law systems values of law |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
