| 论类推思维在法律发现当中的地位——以孙斯坦有关类推思维思想为中心的考察 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李其瑞,王国龙.论类推思维在法律发现当中的地位——以孙斯坦有关类推思维思想为中心的考察[J].山东警察学院学报,2010,22(3):41-49. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李其瑞 王国龙 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西北政法大学刑事法学院,陕西,西安,710063 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 随着人们对传统法律三段论在法律适用过程中作用的反思,一种围绕着类推思维为中心的法律发现模式逐渐获得了人们的普遍认同。借助于未完全理论化协议理论,孙斯坦将类推思维在法律发现当中的地位和作用上升到推进民主司法的高度,从而更有力地彰显了类推思维在当代司法实践当中的重要性。类推思维是一个迈向民主政治的法治社会应该努力倡导的一种法律思维和法律适用模式,捍卫法治需要我们认真地对待类推思维方法在法律发现当中的地位。
|
| 关 键 词： | 类推思维 未完全理论化协议 法律发现 |
On the Role of Analogical Reasoning in Legal Discovery |
| |
| LI Qi-rui,WANG Guo-long.On the Role of Analogical Reasoning in Legal Discovery[J].Journal of Shandong Police College,2010,22(3):41-49. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Qi-rui WANG Guo-long |
| |
| Institution: | LI Qi-rui,WANG Guo-long(School of Criminal Law,North-west University of Politics and Law,Xi'an,Shaanxi,710063,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | With the re-thought of the role of traditional legal syllogism in the application of law,a legal discovery mode centering the analogical interpretation gradually won people's recognition.Sunstein's study of analogical thinking based on the tradition of legal reasoning of common law can be regarded as an effort for the analogical interpretation.With the idea of incompletely theorized agreements,Sunstein promoted the status of analogical thinking in the legal discovery to advance the democratic justice.So the... |
| |
| Keywords: | analogical reasoning incompletely theorized agreements legal discovery |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
