首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

浅谈谢绝自带酒水
引用本文:王岩.浅谈谢绝自带酒水[J].行政与法,2006(11):98-99.
作者姓名:王岩
作者单位:东北财经大学,法学院,辽宁,大连,116025
摘    要:不得自带酒水是一个老问题,但对它的认识确是空前的一致,无论是学界还是消费者保护的实践,都把它作为侵犯消费者权利的无效的霸王条款。笔者从消费者权利的界定和刨析入手认为该约定既不侵犯消费者的权利,又不违反合同法和其他相关法律的强制性规定,应当成为消费合同的有效的组成部分,消费者应当予以遵守。进而认为对消费者权益的保护应当以法律的理论和相关规定为依据,而不是朴素的感情。

关 键 词:消费者权益  自主选择权  知悉真情权  公平交易权  格式条款的效力
文章编号:1007-8207(2006)11-0098-02
修稿时间:2006年3月20日

On Restaurant's Refusing Drinks and Wine Brought by Consumers
Wang Yan.On Restaurant''''s Refusing Drinks and Wine Brought by Consumers[J].Public Administration & Law,2006(11):98-99.
Authors:Wang Yan
Abstract:restaurant's refusing drinks and wine brought by consumers is always be considered as an high-handed term infringing upon the consumer's right.However,the author thinks that the agreement doesn't infringe the consumer's right as well as break the contract law and other legally compulsory regulations,starting with defining and dissecting the consumer's right.Moreover,it should become the component of consumption contract.The protection for consumers should be on the foundation of the law theory and regulations concerned but not simple affection.
Keywords:consumer's right  self-choice right  the right to know  the right to fair exchange  the effect of formal terms
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号