首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

公共起诉资格的生成
引用本文:陈承堂.公共起诉资格的生成[J].环球法律评论,2011,33(5):113-124.
作者姓名:陈承堂
作者单位:扬州大学法学院
基金项目:江苏省2010年度高校哲学社会科学基金项目“宏观调控行为的可诉性研究”;教育部2011年度人文社会科学研究项目“调控受体信赖利益的司法保护”的阶段性研究成果
摘    要:根据起诉资格的私法模式,救济与权利是相互依存的,只有那些自身权利受到威胁(或损害)的人才有资格获得救济。然而,此种旨在维护个人普通法权利的私法模式对于规制型国家中大量出现的制定法利益已不敷其用,从而导致体现这些制定法利益的公共起诉资格模式应运而生。该模式确认起诉资格的标准相继体现为不法侵害标准和“当事人遭受损害”条款标准,并且宽泛的“当事人遭受损害”条款标准导致的违宪争议也随着法兰克弗特法官所创造的“私人检察总长”术语而得以消解。

关 键 词:公共起诉资格  私法模式  私人检察总长

The Shaping of Public Right Model of Standing to Sue:Taking American Law as the Core Reference
Chen Chengtang.The Shaping of Public Right Model of Standing to Sue:Taking American Law as the Core Reference[J].Global Law Review,2011,33(5):113-124.
Authors:Chen Chengtang
Institution:Chen Chengtang
Abstract:According to a private right model of standing to sue,remedy and right are interdependent.Only those whose own rights are threatened or violated are eligible for remedy.However,such private right model aimed at protecting individual’s rights provided by common law can not be applied to protect statutory interest appeared in large numbers in regulatory state any more.As a result,a public right model of standing that reflects statutory interest has taken shape.In determining the standing to sue,the criterion of this model has manifested itself as the test of "legal wrongs" and the test of clause of the "party aggrieved" in succession.In addition,following the use of the term "private attorney general" advanced by judge Frank,the debate about the unconstitutionality of the broad definition of the test of clause of "party aggrieved" has been gone.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号