首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论不作为侵权及其法律完善
引用本文:赵万一,蒋英燕.论不作为侵权及其法律完善[J].北方法学,2010,4(1):36-45.
作者姓名:赵万一  蒋英燕
作者单位:1. 西南政法大学民商法学院
2. 上海大学
摘    要:不作为侵权是与作为侵权相对应的一种侵权形式。与作为侵权相比,不作为侵权不但有其独特的价值目标和理论基础,而且有其特殊的构成要件和责任规制要求。不作为侵权与一般性民事救助义务密切相联,其司法适用除依赖明确的法律刚性规定之外,还受制于公序良俗、习惯、诚实信用原则等软性因素的影响。在我国未来的侵权责任法立法中,应在广泛借鉴外国先进立法理念和成熟制度的基础上,结合中国的国情积极引入这一制度。在立法技术上可采取概括加列举的方式对这一制度的适用进行必要限制。

关 键 词:侵权行为  不作为侵权  一般性救助义务  立法完善

On the Tort by Omission and Its Legislative Perfection
ZHAO Wan-yi,JIANG Ying-yan.On the Tort by Omission and Its Legislative Perfection[J].Northern Legal Science,2010,4(1):36-45.
Authors:ZHAO Wan-yi  JIANG Ying-yan
Institution:ZHAO Wan-yi, JIANG Ying-yan
Abstract:In respect of the form of tort liability,the tort by omission is the counterpart of the tort by act,and compared with the latter,the former not only has its own particular values and theoretical grounds,but also has its own constitutive requirements and liability requirements. The tort by omission is closely related to general civil salvage obligation. As regulated by specific entrenched clauses,its juristic application is also subject to jus publice stabilitum,costum,bona fide doctrine,etc. The tort by omi...
Keywords:tort  tort by omission  general salvage obligation  legislative perfection  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号