首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

规范刑法学中犯罪本质认识的三个误区
引用本文:陈檬.规范刑法学中犯罪本质认识的三个误区[J].天津市政法管理干部学院学报,2005,21(4):31-35.
作者姓名:陈檬
作者单位:北京大学法学院 北京100081
摘    要:犯罪本质是刑法学研究的核心内容,在中国刑法学界对其研究也是由来以久。但中国的刑法学者关于规范刑法学中犯罪本质的认识存在三个误区:第一,认为社会危害性说与法益侵害说是关于犯罪本质学说的分歧;第二,法益侵害说的过度提倡;第三,形而上的犯罪本质研究与积极的罪刑法定原则。笔者采取叙述性的描述方式,阐述了这三个误区,澄清了规范刑法学中犯罪本质研究的相关概念,为关于犯罪本质研究奠定基础。

关 键 词:社会危害性  法益侵害说  规范违反说  积极的罪刑法定
文章编号:1008-8393(2005)04-0031-05
修稿时间:2005年9月10日

The Misapprehension in the Realization of Criminal Essence
CHEN Meng.The Misapprehension in the Realization of Criminal Essence[J].Journal of Tianjin Administrative Institute of Political Science & Law,2005,21(4):31-35.
Authors:CHEN Meng
Abstract:Criminal essence is the core in criminology.There are three kinds of misapprehension in the realization of criminal essence by Chinese criminal law experts: the first,they consider the divergence of the theory of criminal essence is between " harm to society " and " harm to legal interest";the seco nd,the theory of " harm to legal interest" has been overadvocated;the third,metaphysical research about criminal essence and the active principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime.The author expounds these three kinds of misapprehension and clarifies some concepts about criminal essence.
Keywords:the theory of " harm to society"  the theory of " harm to legal interest"  the theory of norm violation  the active principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号