首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

我国非法证据排除规则实施相关问题之探讨
引用本文:郭旭.我国非法证据排除规则实施相关问题之探讨[J].行政与法,2014(7):71-75.
作者姓名:郭旭
作者单位:中国政法大学,北京100088
基金项目:本文系教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目基金资助、教育部人文社会科学重点研究重大项目“非法证据排除规则在中国的实施问题研究”的阶段性成果.项目编号:11JJD820016.
摘    要:非法证据排除规则是我国《刑事诉讼法》新增加的重要内容,在实现保障人权的价值目标中发挥着重要作用.我国的非法证据排除规则具有自身的特点,在司法实践中也存在一些问题急需理论上予以解决.本文认为,非法证据排除的范围已经逐渐从“非法手段”扩大至“程序违法”,而现行的侦查、审查起诉和审判阶段均可依职权或依申请排除非法证据的规定并不能收到很好的效果.因此,在实施非法证据排除的过程中,有必要对非法证据排除的方式、效果和证明标准进行深入探讨.

关 键 词:非法证据  排除规则  刑事诉讼法

Some Relevant Issues about the Implementation of the Exclusive Rule of Illegal Evidence in China
Guo Xu.Some Relevant Issues about the Implementation of the Exclusive Rule of Illegal Evidence in China[J].Public Administration & Law,2014(7):71-75.
Authors:Guo Xu
Abstract:The newly revised criminal procedure law incorporated the exclusive rule of illegal evidence,which is playing an important role in safeguarding the human rights.The exclusive rule of illegal evidence in China has its own characteristics,and along with some problems in the process of implementation,which are badly in need of being worked out in theory.According to his article,the scope of exclusion of illegul evidence has gradually expanded from "unlawful means" to "breach of procedural law" ,but the existing provision that the illegal evidence could be excluded according to the authority or the application in the investigation,prosecution and trial stages doesn't have good effect.Therefore,in the implementation of the exclusion of illegal evidence,it was the methods,the effects and the standard of proof of the exclusion of illegal evidence that are necessarily discussed in deep.
Keywords:the exclusive rule of illegal evidence  the implementation of criminal procedure law
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号