首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论证据申请及其裁决
引用本文:孙远.论证据申请及其裁决[J].现代法学,2011,33(5):110-120.
作者姓名:孙远
作者单位:中国青年政治学院法律系,北京,100089
摘    要:证据申请是当事人一项非常重要的诉讼权利,但现行《刑事诉讼法》及相关司法解释为当事人行使该项权利,设定了过于严苛的条件,且法官对于该申请的裁决亦仅凭一个预断性标准恣意为之,更有甚者,对法官这样一个恣意而为的裁决,现行法律中不存在任何上诉审查的可能性。凡此种种均造成当事人的证据申请权名存实亡。正确的解决之道应当是,降低当事人证据申请的条件,明确规定法庭对证据申请进行裁决的具体标准以及预断禁止原则,并且通过解释论与立法论两方面的考量,探索实现上诉审对原审裁判展开事后审查的可能性。

关 键 词:证据申请  预断禁止  事后审查制

Application for Evidence Collection and Relevant Rulings
SUN Yuan.Application for Evidence Collection and Relevant Rulings[J].Modern Law Science,2011,33(5):110-120.
Authors:SUN Yuan
Institution:SUN Yuan (Department of Law,China Youth University For Polictical Sciences,Beijing 100089,China)
Abstract:Application for evidence collection is held as a very important right of the parties in criminal proceedings.However,too rigorous requirements are set out in the existing criminal procedural law and relevant judicial constructions for those who want to enjoy the right and the court's rulings on the applications seem arbitrary without reliable criteria.What is even worse is that no appeal from such a ruling is available under existing laws.Indeed,application for evidence collection is only an empty title in ...
Keywords:application for evidence collection  prohibit prejudgment  post-review procedure  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号