| 突破与超越:《侵权责任法》产品后续观察义务之解读 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张云.突破与超越:《侵权责任法》产品后续观察义务之解读[J].现代法学,2011,33(5):174-183. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张云 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国计量学院法学院,浙江杭州,310018 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目，浙江省软科学研究计划项目，浙江省人文社会科学重点研究基地“标准化与知识产权管理”自主立项课题 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《侵权责任法》第46条确立了我国产品的后续观察义务。这一制度的确立符合社会安全和公平正义的理念。然而,由于缺乏相关的解释,该条在适用中将与产品质量法中的发展缺陷免责条款存在冲突,第46条可以认为是对发展缺陷免责条款的修正。另外,违背后续观察义务所产生之产品责任应遵循无过错责任原则,侵权责任范围不应包括惩罚性赔偿。
|
| 关 键 词： | 侵权责任法 产品后续观察 售后警示 召回 |
Breakthrough and Surmounting: Duty of Follow-up Observation in Art.46 of the Tort Claims Act |
| |
| ZHANG Yun.Breakthrough and Surmounting: Duty of Follow-up Observation in Art.46 of the Tort Claims Act[J].Modern Law Science,2011,33(5):174-183. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Yun |
| |
| Institution: | ZHANG Yun (Law School of China Jiliang University,Hangzhou 310018,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Fallow-up observation,a duty imposed on sold products by Art.46 of the Tort Claims Act of the People's Republic of China,is consistent with the notion of maintenance of society safety and ascertaining fairness and justice.However,for lack of proper interpretation,it may conflict with the development defect exemption clause in the Product Quality Act while Art.46 may be deemed an alteration to the exemption clause.In addition,the product liability resulted from breach of follow-up observation should be held ... |
| |
| Keywords: | tort law follow-up observation post-sale warning recall |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
