首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

辩论原则下的法官实质指挥诉讼与收集证据的义务
引用本文:翁晓斌,周翠.辩论原则下的法官实质指挥诉讼与收集证据的义务[J].现代法学,2011,33(4):131-139.
作者姓名:翁晓斌  周翠
作者单位:浙江大学光华法学院,浙江杭州,310008
摘    要:《证据规定》虽然在我国民事诉讼中植入了辩论原则,但同时也留下了合法性不足、转型不彻底、配套不完善等缺陷。未来通过法律修改确立的辩论主义应当是经过修正的辩论主义,而赋予法官实质指挥诉讼义务和依职权收集证据义务乃是修正辩论主义的重要方法。这两种方法有利于在辩论主义条件下查明事实真相和实现实体公正,从而有效克服辩论主义绝对化产生的弊端。

关 键 词:辩论主义  职权探知主义  修正  实质指挥诉讼  收集证据

Judges' Obligation to Direct Litigation and Collect Evidence in the Context of Party presentation
WENG Xiao-bin,ZHOU Cui.Judges' Obligation to Direct Litigation and Collect Evidence in the Context of Party presentation[J].Modern Law Science,2011,33(4):131-139.
Authors:WENG Xiao-bin  ZHOU Cui
Institution:(Zhejiang University Guanghua Law School, Hongzhou 310008, China)
Abstract:Although Beibringungsgrundsatz (principle of party presentation) was introduced into the Evidence Rules,still some problems are left to be solved. The principle of the"party presentation,"where it is to be affirmed in the civil procedure law in the future,should be limited in the following ways:judges should take the responsibility of materielle Prozessleitungspflicht and should produce evidence on their own initiative. The two ways will conduce to fact finding and substantial justice and offset the disadvantages resulting from absolutization of principle of party presentation.
Keywords:Beibringungsgrundsatz  court control  revision  substantially control litigation  collect evidence
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号