首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

公共场所隐私权的悖论
引用本文:刘泽刚.公共场所隐私权的悖论[J].现代法学,2008,30(3):168-174.
作者姓名:刘泽刚
作者单位:西南政法大学,重庆,401120
摘    要:"公共场所隐私权"是个悖论式的问题。实践中,西方国家已经承认了公共场所隐私权的合法性。隐私权保护重心从"场所"到"人"的转变,以及由此产生的"合理隐私预期"是公共场所隐私权的法律依据,然而,"合理隐私预期"至今仍然缺乏明确的标准和法理依据,这根源于对"公共场所"之"公共性"的误解。"公共场所"大都是公、私混合的"社会场所"。这不仅决定了"公共场所隐私权"的正当性,也决定了对公共场所隐私权进行保护必须突破僵化的公私法分立格局。

关 键 词:隐私权  宪法隐私权  公共领域  公私法关系  人格权
文章编号:1001-2397(2008)03-0168-07
修稿时间:2008年1月18日

Paradox of Right of Privacy in Public Places
LIU Ze-gang.Paradox of Right of Privacy in Public Places[J].Modern Law Science,2008,30(3):168-174.
Authors:LIU Ze-gang
Abstract:"Right of privacy in public places" is a paradox.Indeed,the legitimacy of right of privacy in public places is already admitted in practice in western counties."Reasonable expectation of privacy," resulting from transformation of the protective target of right privacy from "place" to "man," serves as the legal foundation of the right of privacy in public places.However,the reason why as of "reasonable expectation of privacy" has not yet specific criteria or jurisprudential basis lies in misunderstanding of the nature of "publicity" of public places.Public places tend to be a mixture of public and privacy elements,i.e.a "social place." Such a conclusion not only justifies the right of privacy in public places,but also speaks aloud that we should get rid of the rigid separation of public law and private law.
Keywords:right of privacy  constitutional right of privacy  public field  relationship between public law and private law  right of personality
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号