首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

司法公正与民事诉讼审前程序的完善
引用本文:杨文杰.司法公正与民事诉讼审前程序的完善[J].政法学刊,2006,23(1):49-52.
作者姓名:杨文杰
作者单位:宝鸡文理学院,政法系,陕西,宝鸡,721007
摘    要:现代司法理念体系中司法公正居于核心地位,它是法院审判活动的基本要求和终极目标。目前我国诉讼程序法对诉讼审前程序的规范存在不尽人意之处,答辩制度、证据交换制度、举证时限制度中的缺憾成为制约司法公正的一个重要因素。为此,应当建立强制答辩制度;完善证据交换制度,对当事人查阅案件材料进行必要规范,尽量同一天送达举证通知书,将举证期限届满之日确定为证据交换之日或开庭之日,或者实行证据密封交接;对举证期限申请延期的理由予以明确和具体化,并适用举证期限顺延制度,促进现代司法理念建设,探索实现司法公正的新途径。

关 键 词:司法公正  审前程序  答辩制度  证据交换  举证时限
文章编号:1009-3745(2006)01-0049-04
修稿时间:2005年12月8日

Judicial Justice and the Perfection of Pre-hearing Procedure in Civil Lawsuit
Yang Wen-jie.Judicial Justice and the Perfection of Pre-hearing Procedure in Civil Lawsuit[J].Journal of Political Science and Law,2006,23(1):49-52.
Authors:Yang Wen-jie
Abstract:Judicial justice occupies a central place in modern judicial concept and it is the basic requirement and ultimate goal of hearing activities in the court.At present there exist certain unsatisfactory aspects in pre-hearing procedure of procedural law.The drawback of defense system,evidence exchang system and time limit of adducing evidence is an important factor affecting judicial justice.Therefore,a compulsory defense system shall be established and evidence exchange system be perfected.The reasons for extending time limit of adducing evidence shall be made clear and specified so as to establish modern judicial concept and explore new ways to realize judicial justice.
Keywords:judicial justice  pre-hearing procedure  defense system  evidence exchange  time limit of adducing evidence  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号