首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

侦查机关强制采取物证比对样本的必要性及合法化路径研究
引用本文:李学军,张卫萍,张吉林.侦查机关强制采取物证比对样本的必要性及合法化路径研究[J].法律与医学杂志,2009(2).
作者姓名:李学军  张卫萍  张吉林
作者单位:中国人民大学法学院;黑龙江公安厅刑事技术总队;
基金项目:北京市刑事侦查学研究会2007年研究项目《侦查机关强制采样的必要性及合法化路径研究》的成果。
摘    要:本文讨论了刑事侦查中强制采取物证比对样本的必要性以及立法规制这种强制活动的必要性,探究了强制采样的合法化路径。认为法律应明确侦查机关有权依照必要性原则、适当性原则和比例原则在侦查中强制采取物证比对样本,并就强制采样的主体、对象、程序等问题作出具体规定,否则,就有可能侵犯相关人员的基本人权。

关 键 词:强制采取物证比对样本  物证鉴定  合法化  

On the Necessity and Legitimization Route of Compulsory Collection of Comparative Samples of Physical Evidence in Criminal Investigation.
Li Xuejun,Zhang Weiping.Renmin University of China,Beijing ,Zhang Jilin.On the Necessity and Legitimization Route of Compulsory Collection of Comparative Samples of Physical Evidence in Criminal Investigation.[J].The Journal of Law & Medicine,2009(2).
Authors:Li Xuejun  Zhang WeipingRenmin University of China  Beijing  Zhang Jilin
Institution:Li Xuejun,Zhang Weiping.Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,Zhang Jilin.The Public Security Department of Heilongjiang Province,Harbin 150001
Abstract:This article discusses the necessity of compulsory collection of comparative samples of physical evidence in criminal investigation, the necessity of regulating the compulsory action by legal provisions and explores the legitimization route of compulsory collection of comparative samples.This author points out that our Criminal Procedure Law should explicitly provide the criminal investigation organs' power to collect comparative samples of physical evidence in accordance with three basic principles:necessi...
Keywords:Compulsory collection of comparative samples of physical evidence  Physical evidence authentication  Legitimization  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号