对《刑法修正案(八)》的七点质疑 |
| |
引用本文: | 张立刚.对《刑法修正案(八)》的七点质疑[J].四川警官高等专科学校学报,2012(1):8-15. |
| |
作者姓名: | 张立刚 |
| |
作者单位: | 山东警察学院,山东济南250104 |
| |
摘 要: | 《刑法修正案(八)》对刑法改革的推动意义自不容否认,但7处缺憾的存在却使得《刑法修正案(八)》略显粗糙:以刑法修正案消融刑事立法解释的非法性;以刑法修正案修改刑法总则的合宪性质疑;引入治安管理处罚措施;对未成年犯的过度轻刑化待遇;取消死刑罪名、死缓限制减刑导致刑罚体系结构不谐:社区矫正“尴尬入刑”:危驾入刑有违刑法谦抑性。
|
关 键 词: | 刑法修正案(八) 刑事立法解释 刑法总则 治安管理处罚措施 刑罚结构 社区矫正 危驾入刑:质疑 |
Seven Questions about the Eighth Amendment to Criminal law |
| |
Authors: | ZHANG Li-gang |
| |
Institution: | ZHANG Li-gang |
| |
Abstract: | The significance of the eighth amendment to criminal law promoting criminal law reforming can not be denied,but seven deficiencies existing in it make it a bit rough:the illegality of criminal law a- mendment melting criminal legislative interpretation;the constitutionality of criminal law amendment amend- ing general provisions of criminal law;introducing security management penalties;excessive light punishment for juvenile offenders;penalty structure lack of coordination for abolishing the death penalty charges;commu- nity correction into criminal law;dangerous driving crime violating the restraining of criminal law. |
| |
Keywords: | the Eighth Amendment to Criminal Law Crlminal Legislative Interpretation General Provi-sions of Criminal Law Security Management Penalties Penalty Structure Community Correction DangerousDriving Crime Query |
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录! |