首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

司法裁决的后果主义论证
引用本文:杨知文. 司法裁决的后果主义论证[J]. 法律科学, 2009, 0(3): 3-13
作者姓名:杨知文
作者单位:中国人民大学法学院,北京,100872  
摘    要:后果主义论证是法律论证的一种形式,是实现合理的司法裁判和证成裁决结论的重要要素。司法中后果主义论证关注不同裁判方式所带来的可能后果,通过评判不同的后果来选择裁决结论。与一般情境中的后果论不同,司法裁决的后果主义论证主要出现在法官为正当化案件裁判所进行的二次证明中,它是基于可欲后果的证立,这种可欲后果是裁决的逻辑后果或一般后果。

关 键 词:司法裁决  后果主义论证  二次证明  可欲后果  逻辑后果

Consequentialist Argument of Judicial Decision
YANG Zhiwen. Consequentialist Argument of Judicial Decision[J]. Law Science (Journal of Northwest Institute University of Politics and Law), 2009, 0(3): 3-13
Authors:YANG Zhiwen
Abstract:Consequentialist argument, as one justification form of legal arguments, is an important element of achieving and justifying judicial decision. It concerns that various fashions in judgment will lead to different consequences, which determines what kind of decisions to make. Compared with consequentialism in ordinary context, consequentialist argument of judicial decision mainly exists in the secondary justification process of legal argument, which is based on the desirable consequences called logic consequ...
Keywords:judicial decision  consequentialist argument  secondary justification  desirable consequences  logic consequences  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号