首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

从一重断还是数罪并罚——从牵连关系的限定看牵连犯的处断原则
引用本文:庄劲.从一重断还是数罪并罚——从牵连关系的限定看牵连犯的处断原则[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2007(1):110-116.
作者姓名:庄劲
作者单位:中山大学法学院,广东,广州,510275
摘    要:由于现行牵连犯的概念过于宽泛,既包括数罪的情形也包括一罪的情形,因而无论对牵连犯采数罪并罚还是一罪处断的处罚方针,都是不科学的。实现牵连犯处断原则合理性的关键,并不是在数罪并罚与从一重处断之间进行取舍或者折衷,而应当是限制现行牵连犯的概念,将外延限制在只包含一罪的类型的范围之内。只有将牵连关系限定在“对同一客体的同一次侵犯”之中,才能够保证牵连犯具有一罪的属性,才能对其从一罪处断。

关 键 词:牵连犯  牵连关系  同一客体  同一次侵犯

Single Punishment for One Crime or Joinder Punishments for Plural Crimes——On the Sentencing Principle of Implicated Offense
ZHUANG Jin.Single Punishment for One Crime or Joinder Punishments for Plural Crimes——On the Sentencing Principle of Implicated Offense[J].Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute,2007(1):110-116.
Authors:ZHUANG Jin
Abstract:The extension of implicated offense is too wide,so it's not reasonable for implicated offense to be sentenced with single punishment for one crime or joinder punishments for plural crimes.The key to make the punishment of implicated offense reasonable is to restrict the extension of implicated offense within the scope of single crime.Only if the implicated relation is defined to be being in one course of infringing an object,implicated crime is a type of single crime and deserves single punishment for one crime.
Keywords:implicated offense  implicated relation  one object  one infringing course
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号