“文化霸权”话语的本土实践与反思

“文化霸权”成为1990年代以来人们谈论东西方文学与文化关系时所使用的关键词之一，开创了在中国文论语境下的“理论旅行”。它从思维模式的“二元对立”、话语领域的西方霸权、民族情结的强烈诉求与传统文化的回归和高扬等四个方面展开其话语实践。在其话语实践中，重新陷入了“文革话语”的历史圈套，遮蔽了我国文论发展的历史与现实以及所面临的问题，对西方进行想象化的本质处理与传统文化的异化塑形，彰显出本土权力的运作机制。我国文论应该在世界文论体系的观照下实现自身的现代化，为世界文论的发展做出特有的贡献，促进文论知识科学有序增长。

The Local Practice and Reconception of the Discourse of "Cultural Hegemony"

"Culture Hegemony",which initiated its "theory travel" in the context of Chinese literary theory,has been one of the key words used for the discussion of the relationship between Oriental and Occidental literature and culture since 1990s.It expands its discourse practice from four aspects: dualism in thinking,Occidental hege-mony in discourse,appeal for national complex and returning to traditional culture.But in the course of local practice,it runs into the historical trap of "cultural revolution discourse",thus shielding the history and reality of literary criticism development,and problems it faces in China as well.The operation mechanism of local power is shown in the imaginary attitude for western literary theory and shaping of traditional culture in alienation.The Chinese(literary) theory should implement its own modernization according to the world literary theory system,making contributions to the development of global literary theory and to orderly increase of the science in literary theory.