首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

在法律真实与客观真实之间-论事实真伪不明案件的司法裁判规则
引用本文:田庚.在法律真实与客观真实之间-论事实真伪不明案件的司法裁判规则[J].时代法学,2013(5):73-78.
作者姓名:田庚
作者单位:淮安市中级人民法院民事审判第一庭,江苏淮安223001
摘    要:历史的不可回复性、案件证据的证明相对性以及法官认识能力的有限理性,决定了事实真伪不明案件的客观存在。法官不得拒绝裁判的司法规则要求法官对于事实真伪不明的案件必须作出处理,但是证明责任的滥用与事实推定的失范违背了司法裁判权的运行规律。要解决该问题,需要从改良事实认定模式、谨慎适用证明责任、认真对待经验法则等方面入手,构建良性互动的事实真伪不明案件的事实认定裁判规则,让司法裁判最大限度地获取社会公众认同。

关 键 词:客观真实  法律真实  真伪不明  规则

Between the Objective Truth and Legal Truth -Study on the Referee Rules and Technology of Non Liquet Case
TIAN Geng.Between the Objective Truth and Legal Truth -Study on the Referee Rules and Technology of Non Liquet Case[J].Presentday Law Science,2013(5):73-78.
Authors:TIAN Geng
Institution:TIAN Geng ( Huai'an Intermediate People's Court Civil Trial Chamber Ⅱ, Huai'an, Jiangsu 223001, China)
Abstract:Non-recoverable of history, proof relativity of evidence, limited rational of judge cog nitive ability,make non liquet objective existence. The rules that a judge is not allowed to refuse ref eree enforce, require the judge trial non liquet case, but the abuse of the fact presumption and ano mie of presumption of fact violate operation rules of judicial jurisdiction. To solve this problem, the need to amend fact model, cautious application of burden of proof, treat the experience rule serious ly and more, structure positive interaction with rules of adjudication for non liquet case, make public identify with judicial decision best.
Keywords:objective truth  legal authenticity  non liquet  rules
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号