A comment on methodological concerns: A rejoinder |
| |
Authors: | Llad Phillips Subhash Ray Harold L. Votey |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Economics University of California Santa Barbara, California 93106, U.S.A.;Department of Economics University of Connecticut Storrs, Connecticut 06268, U.S.A.;Department of Economics University of California Santa Barbara, California 93106, U.S.A. |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() This rejoinder to Professor Cohen's Comment is intended to elaborate on approaches we utilized in our original paper. Some of our specification was necessitated by data availability (e.g., the specification of the sanction process). We attempt to clarify our approach in regard to the intervention process. We provide an explanation of the modeling that could underly a test of the hypothesis that the control effect is a product of the arrest process—a test that we had regarded as informative but peripheral to our main points. As noted, a significant part of that test utilizes the full range of control variables available to us. Finally, we enumerate what we felt to be the main points of our paper—points we are afraid might otherwise be lost in this discussion of methodology. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|