Regulation of incivilities in the UK,Italy and Belgium: Courts as potential safeguards against legislative vagueness and excessive use of penalising powers? |
| |
Institution: | 1. University Sains Malaysia, School of Housing, Building & Planning, USM, 11800 Pulau Penang, Malaysia;2. University Sains Malaysia, School of Educational Studies, USM, 11800 Pulau Penang, Malaysia;1. Aoyama Gakuin University, Japan;2. University of California Hastings College of the Law, USA |
| |
Abstract: | In recent years, the legislators in the UK, Italy and Belgium have progressively empowered local authorities to subject sometimes already criminalised and harmful, but also some relatively harmless uncivil conduct to intrusive and punitive measures deeply affecting individuals' rights. However, judicial action in these three countries has been recently trying to restrain the (illegitimate) use of penalising powers of local authorities by delivering interesting liberty-safeguarding decisions. This paper firstly describes the (expanded) regulation of incivilities in the three aforesaid European countries. Secondly, it focuses on two criteria that inform judicial review of legislative and administrative action, namely the principle of legality and the principle of proportionality. Thirdly, it examines the case law of English, Welsh and Scottish courts, along with Italian and Belgian courts, and shows how courts can safeguard the individual's rights and freedoms against (illegitimate) penalisation of conduct that is deemed anti-social or uncivil at the local level. |
| |
Keywords: | Incivilities Regulation Public order Judicial review Legality Proportionality |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|