首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

限制行政权力的路径选择——“行政三分制”改革的宪政分析
引用本文:汪进元,冯家亮.限制行政权力的路径选择——“行政三分制”改革的宪政分析[J].行政与法,2005(2):29-31.
作者姓名:汪进元  冯家亮
作者单位:武汉大学,法学院,湖北,武汉,430072
摘    要:《深圳市深化行政管理体制改革试点方案》,是深圳“行政三分制”改革的替代方案。深圳市实行的行政改革,存在内在矛盾和缺陷。从宪法学角度看,要限制行政权力就必须从国家权力宏观角度选择限制行政权力的路径,即在人民代表大会制度框架内通过法律规范行政权力;通过创造“社会交往民主”的制度环境以实现人民主权;建立公共财政,为政府行政提供强有力的财力支持;通过听证、回避等具体的行政程序的设定和行政复议、行政诉讼等救济方式保护行政相对人的合法权益。

关 键 词:“行政三分制”改革  限制行政权力  规范行政权力
文章编号:1007-8207(2005)02-0029-03
修稿时间:2004年11月4日

The Chosen Way of the Restriction of Administrative Power -the constitutionalism analysis of reform of separation of administrative power
Wang Jin-yuan,Feng Jia-liang.The Chosen Way of the Restriction of Administrative Power -the constitutionalism analysis of reform of separation of administrative power[J].Public Administration & Law,2005(2):29-31.
Authors:Wang Jin-yuan  Feng Jia-liang
Abstract:The experimental outline of Shenzhen city's deepening the reform of administrative management system is the substitute for Shenzhen city's administrative separation of powers,and it harbors contradictions and defects.In the eyes of constitutionalism,to restrict administrative power means to choose the way of restriction administrative power from the state power macroscopic view,to standardize administrative power through law within the system of People's Congress;To realize the sovereignty of the people by creating "social contact democracy" system through to establish public budget in order to support the governmental administration financially;And to protect the administrative opposite people's rights by the systematic establishments of hearing,administrative reconsideration and procedure and so on are the purposes of the reform.
Keywords:reform of administrative separation of power  restrict administrative power  standardize administrative power
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号