首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

侵犯商业秘密罪若干争议问题研究
引用本文:刘宪权,吴允锋.侵犯商业秘密罪若干争议问题研究[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2006(4):20-27.
作者姓名:刘宪权  吴允锋
作者单位:华东政法学院,法律学院,上海,200042
摘    要:侵犯商业秘密罪中的重大损失既包括直接损失,也包括间接损失。重大损失应限于物质损失,而不应包括因侵权而导致的荣誉、名誉的损失。重大损失与商业秘密的自身价值不能等同。认定侵犯商业秘密重大损失应综合考虑以权利人的损失、侵权人的获利或商业秘密的许可使用费进行计算。侵犯商业秘密罪是一种故意犯罪,其主观方面不应包括过失。侵犯商业秘密罪中的“应知”不同于刑法总则中的疏忽大意过失中对危害结果的“应当预见”,刑法分则中的“应知”是一种对犯罪对象的客观性预见,其应理解为“应可推为明知”,是一种推定故意的心理态度。

关 键 词:侵犯商业秘密罪  重大损失  主观方面  应知

Research on the Problems of Commercial Espionage
LIU Xian-quan,WU Yun-feng.Research on the Problems of Commercial Espionage[J].Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute,2006(4):20-27.
Authors:LIU Xian-quan  WU Yun-feng
Abstract:The heavy loss in the commercial espionage includes direct loss and indirect loss.The heavy loss should be limited in material loss and shouldn't include honorary and glory loss caused by infringement of right.The inherent value of heavy loss are not equal to that of commercial secret.Heavy loss of commercial espionage should be counted according to the righter' loss,infringement person's profit and the usage fee of permit.The crime of commercial espionage is a kind of intentional crime and its subjective aspect shouldn't include negligence.The "Should know" in the crime of commercial espionage is different from the one in general principles of criminal law.The "Should know" in the specific provisions of criminal law is a objective prediction of criminal object and should be understood "Should be deduced knowingly" which is a mind attitude of deducing to be deliberate.
Keywords:crime of commercial espionage  heavy loss  subjective aspect  should know
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号