关于物权契约独立性理论建构的前提性反思

动产物权变动为什么必须经过交付,交付是否暗含了一个转移物权的契约或者只是一个单纯的履行债权契约的事实行为,黑格尔基于市民社会辩证法对抽象个人观所作的批判以及特殊意志的现实性能够有效地解读要发生物权变动的法律效果必须交付的问题。黑格尔共同意志与特殊意志相对实存的二元架构对于理解意思表示(Willenserklarung)和确证交付作为处分行为的现实载体所具有的独立性具有重大现实指导意义,能够为有效读解关于物权契约的理论争议厘清认识前提。

The Reflection on Premise of the Principle of Division of the Contract of Transfer of the Right on Property

Why must the goods and chattels be delivered if you want to pass the property in the goods and chattels to others? Does delivery imply a separate contract of transferring property or merely imply performance of a purchase and sale contract? On the basis of dialectic on civil society, Hegel animadverted on abstract individual and advanced the existence of special will. Both can unscramble why the goods and chattels must be delivered if somebody want to obtain the personal property in it. The duality frame of common will and special will can help us to understand what is Willenserklarung and realize the significance of the principle of division. Moreover, it supplies the premise reflection of the argument about the principle of division.