无形财产的理论和立法问题

文章认为 ,无形财产本质上是一种权利 ,它与有形财产从权利角度而言是相同的。无形财产的存在实际上是传统“物化思维”的产物 ,它能有效地界定利益、扩展财产范围并对传统财产权体系理论造成冲击。作者同时指出 ,从“权利”和“行为”角度去分析财产、统一财产权的理论是未来财产权理论发展的方向 ,其中对英美权利分析理论的借鉴是一个必不可少的环节。作者认为 ,无形财产的立法实际上涉及到整个财产权体系的立法问题 ,随着权利的多元化、客体的虚位和国家强力的作用进一步加强 ,财产权立法体系将出现专门化、分散化的趋势。

On the Theoretic and Legislative issue of Intangible Property

In this article, the author argued that intangible property is one kind of right in its nature, and it is the same as tangible property from the angle of right. The existence of intangible property is the product of traditional “materialized thinking”, and it can classifies interestes, broadenes the scope of property effectively, and makes a impact on traditional theory of property system. The anthor also pointed out that it is the future direction of the development of property theory to analyse property and unify property theory from the angle of “right” and “behaviour”, and borrowing Anglo American theory of right analysis is a necessary step. The author considered that the legislation of intangible property in fact involves the legislative issue of whole property system, and along with the pluralization of rights, the insubstantiality of objects and the further strenthening of the effects of state force, there will comes a trend of specialization and decentralization in legislative system of property rights.