首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

雇佣纠纷中的医疗隐私
引用本文:蒋云蔚.雇佣纠纷中的医疗隐私[J].中国法学,2012(3):95-102.
作者姓名:蒋云蔚
作者单位:复旦大学法学院
基金项目:教育部人文社科基金项目“患者隐私权研究”阶段性研究成果(项目编号为09YJC820017);国家社科基金资助(项目编号为09CFX038)
摘    要:在雇佣纠纷中,雇员的医疗隐私为讼争焦点之一。究竟应赋予雇员隐私权还是赋予雇主知情权,取决于雇员隐私利益与雇主知情利益之间的衡量。而利益衡量的标准须符合戴维·米勒所谓的应得工作的原则。当雇员的医疗信息与雇主的经营成本有关,雇主知情权优先。2010年人力资源和社会保障部、教育部、卫生部三部委联合发布的《关于进一步规范入学和就业体检项目维护乙肝表面抗原携带者入学和就业权利的通知》禁止就业乙肝检测,虽符合就业市场的分配正义,但应明确规定允许乙肝检测的特殊行业;并且,这一规定不应推广至艾滋病检测。

关 键 词:雇员隐私  雇主自由  利益衡量  应得原则

Medical Privacy in Employment Disputes
Jiang Yunwei.Medical Privacy in Employment Disputes[J].China Legal Science,2012(3):95-102.
Authors:Jiang Yunwei
Institution:Jiang Yunwei
Abstract:In employment disputes,employee’s medical privacy is one of the focuses in the relevant lawsuits.In practice,with regard to employee’s right to privacy and employer’s right to know,which one is prior depends on balancing employee’s privacy interests and employer’s interests to know.The standards of balancing interests should accord with David Miller’s principle of deserved work.When employee’s medical information is related to employer’s operational cost,the employer’s right to know is prior.In 2010,the Ministry of Labor and Social Security,the Ministry of education and the Ministry of Health together promulgated the Notice Regarding Further Regulating Physical Examination to Protect the Educational and Working Rights of HBV Carriers to prohibit the physical examination for HBV.Although this notice is reasonable according to distributive justice of employment market,this notice should permit some certain industries to examine if applicants are HBV carriers.In addition,this notice should not be extended to the examination in HIV/AIDS.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号