首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“责任本质”上的对立学说问题辨析
引用本文:张万顺.“责任本质”上的对立学说问题辨析[J].河南公安高等专科学校学报,2008,17(3):65-67.
作者姓名:张万顺
作者单位:湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭411105
摘    要:大陆法系刑法学之“责任”与我国大陆地区刑法学中的“刑事责任”存在本质区别,故对“责任本质”的考察不应立足于我国大陆地区之“刑事责任”。责任的“本质”应该与责任的“基础(或对象)”、“内容(或判断要素)”相区分。目前,在“责任本质”学说方面,存在道义责任论、社会责任论与法的责任论的对立。

关 键 词:“责任本质”  道义责任论  社会责任论  法的责任论

Differentiations on Theories Opposing of "Liability Essence"
ZHANG Wan-shun.Differentiations on Theories Opposing of "Liability Essence"[J].Journal of Henan Public Security Academy,2008,17(3):65-67.
Authors:ZHANG Wan-shun
Institution:ZHANG Wan-shun (Law School of Xiangtan University, Xiangtan Hunan China 411105)
Abstract:The concept of liability in the criminal law theory of continental legal system is different from criminal liability in Chinese Mainland. So, when reviewing on the question of liability essence, the base point should not be set on the criminal liability in Chinese Mainland. The liability essence should be differed from the liability basis (or object), content (or judging elements). At present, on the question of liability eSsence, there are conflicts between the liability theory of morality, the liability theory of society and the liability theory of law.
Keywords:"Liabilitv essence"  The liabilitv theory of morality  The liability theory of society  The liability theory of law
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号