首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

试论商标的"反向假冒"
引用本文:陈耀东. 试论商标的"反向假冒"[J]. 天津市政法管理干部学院学报, 2002, 18(1): 5-8
作者姓名:陈耀东
作者单位:南开大学法学系 天津300071
摘    要:
2001年12月1日实行的《商标法》将商标的“反向假冒”行为规定为商标侵权行为。国外的法律规定中或将之认定为不正当竞争行为,或视为商标侵权行为。本文通过对一起案例的分析,在探讨商标“反向假冒”构成要件的基础上,认为将此类行为规定为侵权行为,在立法选择和法律政策上是完全可行的。从不同的角度,通过完善反不正当竞争法或消费者权益保护法,来认定并禁止商标的“反向假冒”,在理论和实践中也是可行的。

关 键 词:商标  反向假冒  商标法  反不正当竞争法
文章编号:1008-8393(2002)01-0005-04
修稿时间:2001-11-12

Reverse Passing -off of Trademark
CHEN Yao-dong. Reverse Passing -off of Trademark[J]. Journal of Tianjin Administrative Institute of Political Science & Law, 2002, 18(1): 5-8
Authors:CHEN Yao-dong
Abstract:
The Reverse passing-off is prescribed in the newly amended Trademark law as trademark tort behavior, whereas, in foreign laws and regulations, it is regarded either as unfair competitive behavior or trademark tort behavior. Analysis of one case on the basis of probing into constituting elements of trademark reverse passing-off leads to the conclusion that it is feasible to prescribe behavior of this kind as being tort in the perspectives of legislation orientation and legal policy, and that it is also feasible to recognize and prohibit trademark reverse passing-off,both theoretically and practically, through improving on Unfair competition law and Law of protection of consumer rights and interests law from various angles.
Keywords:trademark  reverse passing-off  Trade Mark Law  unfair competition law  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号