Race matters: A critical look at racial profiling, it's a matter for the courts |
| |
Authors: | Michael L. Birzer Gwynne Harris Birzer |
| |
Affiliation: | aSchool of Community Affairs, Wichita State University, 1845 North Fairmount, Wichita, KS 67260-0135, United States;bHite, Fanning, & Honeyman, LLP, 100 East Douglas, Suite 950, Wichita, KS 67202, United States |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() The disproportionate number of minority motorists stopped by the police gives rise to a host of salient questions which center on contemporary police practices. Research has shown that traffic stops are routinely used as a “pretext” to stop minority drivers. In this article, the authors argue that the current police practice of disproportionately stopping minority motorists was formally sanctioned by the Supreme Court in Whren v. United States (1996). The current thrust to examine police practices will do little to end racial profiling, and the underpinnings of this problem, in part, lie in judicial precedent. The authors present the notion that in order to minimize racial profiling, the court must carve out an objective test from the Whren decision that will guide police behavior in the pretextual stops of motorists. The article concludes with a template of what this objective test may look like. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|