首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论实际履行的适用与限制的法经济学依据
引用本文:刘廷华. 论实际履行的适用与限制的法经济学依据[J]. 北方法学, 2010, 4(6): 110-119
作者姓名:刘廷华
作者单位:宜宾学院政府管理学院;四川大学经济学院;
摘    要:
由于产品差异化、证明标准、可预见性规则、争议处理的成本等方面的限制,损害赔偿通常是补偿不足的,造成违约人将部分违约成本外部化,导致了过多的违约,这暗示应该常规地适用实际履行。效率违约理论挑战这个观点,认为实际履行阻碍了资源流向最有价值的用途,或者增加了交易成本。经济分析表明,效率违约理论本身是经不起检验的。而且,由于实际履行与减损规则相互冲突,当守约人能通过市场完成补救时,应限制实际履行。

关 键 词:补偿不足  实际履行  效率违约  减损规则

On Grounds for the Application and Limitations of the Specific Performance from the Law and Economics Perspective
LIU Ting-hua. On Grounds for the Application and Limitations of the Specific Performance from the Law and Economics Perspective[J]. Northern Legal Science, 2010, 4(6): 110-119
Authors:LIU Ting-hua
Affiliation:LIU Ting-hua
Abstract:
Limitations on cost for product differentiation,standard of proof,predictability rules often result in inadequate compensation for damages,which leads to externalization of part of the breach and arouses more defaults.It implies that the specific performance should be applied normally,but such view meets challenge from the theory of efficient breach,which claims that the specific performance prevents resources from flowing to the most valuable use and increases transaction cost.Whereas,economic analysis ind...
Keywords:inadequate compensation  the specific performance  efficient breach  the mitigation rule  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号