罪刑法定视域中的刑法适用解释

罪刑法定原则的价值旨趣及其制约下的刑法文本的特殊性,是刑法解释论生成与解释规则设计的出发点。刑法解释应当坚持以形式解释与主观解释为基础、辅之以实质解释与客观解释的目标定位。刑法的司法解释即刑法适用解释,应当是法官主导、控辩两造参与、结合具体案件的司法裁判与刑法适用、以刑事判例为载体的个案适用性解释。最高法院应当改变发布规范性、抽象性释文的习惯做法,探索通过直接制作和间接确认刑事判例的双重路径进行适用解释。刑法适用解释应当以文义解释为原则、以论理解释为补充,按照先文义解释、后体系解释、历史解释、目的解释并最终诉诸于合宪解释的方法与顺序展开。

On the Criminal Law's Application Interpretation

The value purport of the principle of legality, and the particularity of the text of criminal law deriving from whose restrict, are starting point of thecreation of the theory of interpretation of criminal law and the design ofinterpretation rule. When interpreting the criminal law, it should be based onformalistic and subjective interpretation, with the target orientation of thesubstantial and objective interpretation as a supplement. The judicialinterpretation of criminal law, namely that in application, should be guided bythe judge, participated by the prosecutor and the accused, concerned with thejudicial judgment and application of criminal law in individual cases, with thecriminal prejudication as its carrier. The supreme court should change itscustomary mode of issuing norm and abstractive interpretation, and exploring the approach ofdirect creation and indirect acknowledgment to interpret the criminal law inapplication. The application interpretation of criminal law, should take theliteral interpretation as the rule, then the logical interpretation as asupplement, advancing in the sequence of literal interpretation, then systeminterpretation, then the history interpretation, and the constitutional interpretation as the last dependence.