| 论犯罪过失中注意义务的实质标准 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李希慧,刘期湘.论犯罪过失中注意义务的实质标准[J].现代法学,2007,29(1):107-113. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李希慧 刘期湘 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 北京师范大学,刑事法律科学研究院,北京,100875
2. 武汉大学,法学院,湖北,武汉,430072 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 注意义务的实质判断标准在刑法理论上分歧较大。英美法系存在着客观说与主客观统一说之分,大陆法系存在着主观说、客观说和折衷说之分,而中国刑法学则存在着主观说与主客观统一说之分。上述学说均存在不妥之处,应采取客观注意的主观化标准学说。
|
| 关 键 词： | 注意义务 注意能力 客观注意的主观化标准 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-2397(2007)01-0107-07 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年9月15日 |
Substantial Standards of Duty of Care in Determining Criminal Negligence |
| |
| LI Xi-hui,LIU Qi-xiang.Substantial Standards of Duty of Care in Determining Criminal Negligence[J].Modern Law Science,2007,29(1):107-113. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Xi-hui LIU Qi-xiang |
| |
| Abstract: | Theories of substantial standards of duty of care differ greatly in criminal law.In Anglo-American le- gal system,there are two doctrines:the objective doctrine and the mixed-subjective-and-objective doctrine.Three doctrines exist in the common law system:the subjective doctrine,the objective doctrine and the compromise doc- trine.In China's criminal law,one can find the subjective doctrine and the mixed-subjective-and-objective doc- trine.After a comparative study of the standards of duty of care,this paper maintains that it is best for us to uphold the doctrine of subjectivized standards of objective care. |
| |
| Keywords: | duty of care ability of care subjectivized standards of objective care |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
