非法占有目的司法推定的混乱与匡正——以集资诈骗罪为例

非法占有目的作为主观要素,在认定的时候通常采用司法推定的方式进行,我国将推定的事实基础在司法解释中予以明确规定。但是从宏观角度看,这些规定违反了主、客观关系,违反了责任原则,有客观归罪之嫌;从微观角度看,这些规定出现了很多的不合理结论,给司法实践带来了极大的混乱。在司法推定中应当注重行为作为推定基础事实的作用,在规定上应当采用肯定要素和否定要素相结合的推定模式。

Confusion and Redress of Judicial Presumption on the Purpose of Illegal Possession --Take Crime of Fundraising Frauds as example

As the subjective element,the purpose of illegal possession is often identified by judicial presumption.The basic facts of presumption are regulated clearly in the judicial interpretation.However,in the perspective of macroscopic view,these rules violated the relation between the subjective and objective and the principle of responsibility,which is in suspicious circumstance of objective imputation.In the perspective of microcosmic,these rules lead to many unreasonable conclusion and confuse the judicial practice.In the judicial presumption,the actions should be considered as the key for presuming the basic facts.The presumption mode of combining positive elements with negative elements should be taken in the regulation.