首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

关于赋予检察机关量刑建议权的思考——从许霆盗窃一案说起
引用本文:朱晓文. 关于赋予检察机关量刑建议权的思考——从许霆盗窃一案说起[J]. 政法学刊, 2008, 25(3): 37-40
作者姓名:朱晓文
作者单位:广州市南沙区检察院,广东,广州,511458
摘    要:
最近,许霆盗窃案引起了人们持续的关注和深入的思考,在强大的舆论压力下,此案的被告人许霆最终经历了从被判处无期徒刑到5年有期徒刑的惊险蹦极,一审重审判决的刑期大大缩短,似乎舆论、民意在与司法的较劲中获得了胜利。这种度身订做的判决涉及一系列的问题,并从中读到了赋予检察机关量刑建议权的可行性和必要性。

关 键 词:法律监督  量刑建议权  可行性  必要性

Innovating Legal Supervision Mechanism and Endowing Procuratorial Organs with the Proposal Right of Sentence Discretion-Reflections from the Case of Xu Ting
hu Xiao-wen. Innovating Legal Supervision Mechanism and Endowing Procuratorial Organs with the Proposal Right of Sentence Discretion-Reflections from the Case of Xu Ting[J]. Journal of Political Science and Law, 2008, 25(3): 37-40
Authors:hu Xiao-wen
Affiliation:hu Xiao-wen ( People's Procuratorate of Nansha District, Guangzhou 511458, China)
Abstract:
Recently the case of Xu Ting has drawn continuous attention of people and created a comprehensive consideration. Under the pressure from public opinion, the accused person Xu Ting has experienced a feeling of bungee jumping from a sentence of life imprisonment to a sentence of five-year imprisonment. The term of imprisonment was shortened largely and it seems that the public opinion has won the competition in the struggle with judicature. The tailor-made trail involves a series of problems. However, the present writer finds from the case the feasibility and necessity of endowing procuratorial organs with the proposal right of sentence discretion.
Keywords:Xu Ting's case  proposal right of sentence discretion  historical evolution  feasibility and necessity
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号