论想象竞合犯的诉讼进路选择

实体法上的想象竞合犯表现出较为特殊的结构矛盾,亦即一行为与数犯罪之间的内在矛盾。在付诸刑事司法实践时就存在着两种不同的进路:从处断结论为一犯罪出发的诉讼进路实际上预先地限定了单一诉讼客体的范围,事先对犯罪事实进行了取舍;从结构解析出发的诉讼进路则将想象竞合犯所涉及的数罪均作为独立的诉讼客体分别予以确认,很好地实现了犯罪构成的整理功能,虽然也需要对想象竞合关系与"一行为"进行揭示,但整体上符合人权保障的基本要求,是目前较为理想的进路选择。

On Selection of Judicial Process for Imaginative Joinder of Offenses

The imaginative joinder of offenses in substantive law shows a special structural contradiction,that is,the internal contradiction between one act and several crimes.There are two different approaches in the practice of Criminal Justice.On the one hand,the approach of proceeding from the conclusion as a crime actually limits the scope of a single litigation object in advance,and makes a choice of criminal facts in advance.On the other hand,the litigation approach from the perspective of structural analysis takes several crimes involved in imaginative joinder of offenses as independent litigation objects to be confirmed respectively,which realizes the function of sorting out the constitution of crimes.Although it is necessary to reveal the relationship of imaginative concurrence and"one act",it is in line with the basic requirements of human rights protection on the whole and is an ideal choice at present.