首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

代表人诉讼制度设计缺陷
引用本文:吴英姿.代表人诉讼制度设计缺陷[J].法学家,2009(2).
作者姓名:吴英姿
作者单位:南京大学法学院;
基金项目:章武生教授主持的福特基金项目“解决群体性纠纷的理论与实践”的阶段性成果
摘    要:实证调查表明,代表人诉讼制度不是法院处理群体纠纷案件的唯一方式。当事人人数多少及其相互关系、案件类型、审判成本、外部压力等都是影响法院处理群体纠纷方式的因素。代表人诉讼制度设计存在明显缺陷,导致这个在理论上和立法上被赋予高度期待的制度在实际运作中遭遇重重障碍,群体纠纷案件处理结果成为多方力量博弈的产物。该制度的缺陷提醒我们:法治建设过程中不能抛开国外法律制度产生的特定历史背景、文化基础和制度环境,简单化理解,甚至曲解他国立法,"为我所用"式地盲目借鉴。

关 键 词:代表人诉讼制度  群体诉讼  司法的边界  

The Design Flaws of the Representative Litigation
WU Yingzi,Associate Professor of Nanjing University Law School..The Design Flaws of the Representative Litigation[J].Jurists Review,2009(2).
Authors:WU Yingzi  Associate Professor of Nanjing University Law School
Institution:WU Yingzi,Associate Professor of Nanjing University Law School.
Abstract:Empirical investigation shows that the representative litigation is not the only way which the court uses to deal with group dispute cases. The factors that affect the court deal with the group dispute cases include the number of parties and their relationship, the types of cases, the cost of the trial, the external pressure. There are obvious design flaws in representative litigation system, which led to many obstacles to the actual operation of the system, although people have been granted a high expectat...
Keywords:Representative Litigation  Group Litigation  the Border of Justice  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号