首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

差异与成因:两大法系消极公诉权之评析——兼及我国消极公诉权之完善
引用本文:孙孝福,郭松.差异与成因:两大法系消极公诉权之评析——兼及我国消极公诉权之完善[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2003(3):75-81.
作者姓名:孙孝福  郭松
作者单位:中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北,武汉,430074
摘    要:消极公诉权在公诉权理论中占有极为重要的地位 ,两大法系都对之作出了积极的肯定 ,并在立法上作出了相应的规定。但是 ,两大法系对消极公诉权的规定又显示出了巨大的差异 ,这种差异是由于两大法系在国家政治哲学、法律传统、诉讼理念等方面的区别而造成的。本文分析了两者的差异 ,并对我国消极公诉权的完善提出了意见

关 键 词:消极公诉权  英美法系  大陆法系  差异  成因  完善

Difference and Cause-Comment upon Negative Right of Prosecufion on Two Legal systems
Sun Xianfu,Guo Sun.Difference and Cause-Comment upon Negative Right of Prosecufion on Two Legal systems[J].Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute,2003(3):75-81.
Authors:Sun Xianfu  Guo Sun
Abstract:Negative right of prosecution,which is very important intheory of right of prosecution,has been regarded as positive and provided consequently in common law system and civil caw system.However,their provsions about negative right of prosecution seem quite different,which result rorm their differences in nation philosophy of politics,legal tradifion,lawsilit concept,efc,all which are discussed in the article.
Keywords:Negative Right of Prosecution  Anglo-American Law Sysfem  Civil Law System  Cause  Imvprovement  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号