再论危险驾驶罪的客观方面——超前立法观、实质解释论、类型思维法之运用

《刑法修正案(八)》第22条增设了危险驾驶罪,但是该罪的行为类型欠缺多样性,醉驾行为没有情节的限制,双重既遂标准同时存在,从而导致了该罪的预期功能与现实效果之间的扭曲。为了填补立法漏洞,加强本条的可操作性,应当运用超前立法观、实质解释论和类型思维法,适当丰富该罪的行为类型,将其解释为具体危险犯,以"足以危害公共交通安全"作为统一的既遂标准。

Reviews on the Objective Aspect of the Crime of Dangerous Driving ---Multiple Applications of the Advanced Legislative View,the Substantial Interpretation Theory and the Classified Thinking Pattern

The Eighth Amendment of the Criminal Law has added the crime of dangerous driving in Article22, but the lack of regulation on specified types and no circumstantial limit of drunk driving have resulted in adouble standard to determine the accomplished offense and a distortion of the expected function and the actualeffect. In order to plug the legislative loophole and to improve the applicability of this Article, various approa-ches of advanced legislative view, substantial interpretation theory and classified thinking pattern are suggestedto be applied and specified types of behavior be complemented. Further, this crime should be interpreted asspecific dangerous offense with a unified accomplished standard as being ＂sufficient to jeopardize the publictransportation＂.