首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

侵害债权制度法律性质考察
引用本文:佟强.侵害债权制度法律性质考察[J].现代法学,2005,27(2):85-91.
作者姓名:佟强
作者单位:北京大学法学院,北京,100871
摘    要:债的相对性原则对保护个人自由的作用卓有成效。但随着人类社会化程度提高,相互依赖性增强,限制个人自由滥用的客观要求日益迫切。为顺应上述社会需要,应突破债的相对性原则,建立侵害债权制度。基于传统债法理论的一些观点没有且无法真正反映该制度的本质,债权物权化理论才是解释该制度唯一可行的观点。

关 键 词:侵害债权  法律性质  债的相对性  债权物权化
文章编号:1001-2397(2005)02-0085-07
修稿时间:2005年1月20日

Analysis of the Legal Nature of Encroachment of Obligatory Rights
TONG Qiang.Analysis of the Legal Nature of Encroachment of Obligatory Rights[J].Modern Law Science,2005,27(2):85-91.
Authors:TONG Qiang
Abstract:The relativity of obligatory rights is largely effective to protect an individual’s freedom. However, with the socialization of human activities and enhancement of men’s mutual reliance, there appears an urgent appeal for a restriction of personal freedom. This paper determines that to meet such a social demand, the relativity of financial obligation should be broken up and a regime concerning encroachment of obligatory rights set up. Given traditional obligation-law doctrines have not or cannot reveal the essence of this regime, this author points out that only when we extent obligatory rights to rights in rem can we use such a doctrine to interpret whole issues in this regime.
Keywords:encroachment of obligatory rights  legal nature  relativity of obligatory rights  extension of obligatory rights to rights in rem  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号